{
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "max_facts": 5,
  "confidence_levels": [
    "high",
    "medium",
    "low"
  ],
  "duplicate_similarity_threshold": 0.9,
  "perspectives": [
    {
      "name": "Skeptic",
      "role": "Attacks the strongest argument for the decision; asks what would have to be false for it to fail."
    },
    {
      "name": "Data scientist",
      "role": "Asks what the numbers would have to show, and whether we actually have them."
    },
    {
      "name": "User advocate",
      "role": "Asks who the decision serves, and whether they will feel served."
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrarian",
      "role": "Takes the opposite side seriously, not performatively."
    },
    {
      "name": "Engineer",
      "role": "Asks whether it can be built, maintained, and debugged \u2014 and what breaks first."
    },
    {
      "name": "Economist",
      "role": "Maps incentives and second-order effects: who gets paid what, and why."
    },
    {
      "name": "Security reviewer",
      "role": "Asks how this gets attacked, exploited, or leaked."
    },
    {
      "name": "Child-of-five explainer",
      "role": "Demands a simple explanation; if it can't be explained simply, it isn't understood."
    },
    {
      "name": "10-year historian",
      "role": "Asks what the record will say about this decision in 2036."
    },
    {
      "name": "Devil's accountant",
      "role": "Prices the true cost, including hidden and compounding ones."
    },
    {
      "name": "Field operator",
      "role": "Asks who runs it day to day, and what their worst Tuesday looks like."
    },
    {
      "name": "Systems thinker",
      "role": "Maps feedback loops, bottlenecks, and what this breaks elsewhere."
    },
    {
      "name": "Risk underwriter",
      "role": "Prices the downside: the tail risk, and who is exposed to it."
    },
    {
      "name": "Open-source maintainer",
      "role": "Asks what this looks like if strangers must read, fork, and trust it."
    },
    {
      "name": "Negotiator",
      "role": "Asks what the other side's best move is, and what our walk-away looks like."
    },
    {
      "name": "Time traveler (2036)",
      "role": "Looks back from 2036: was this the move, or the near-miss?"
    },
    {
      "name": "First-principles physicist",
      "role": "Strips the decision to irreducible facts; asks what must be true."
    },
    {
      "name": "Ethicist",
      "role": "Asks who can be harmed, who can't consent, and whether this is the right thing anyway."
    },
    {
      "name": "Competitor analyst",
      "role": "Asks how the strongest competitor would answer, and what they see that we don't."
    },
    {
      "name": "Black's chair",
      "role": "Asks what Black would actually do, given his grants, carve-outs, and stated style: results only, $0 path first, verify before asserting, never ship simulations as products, no spending or wallet signing without him."
    }
  ]
}